Nguyen Le PhongNguyen Le Phong

Modal Thinking: Separate Deciding From Doing

Keep deciding and doing in two separate modes, and never let them run at the same time. In decision mode, lean on your own history and remember an arbitrary choice beats an impulsive one. In execution mode, there is nothing left to weigh — judging the move is decision mode's job, later, with a calm head.

The idea is simple but freeing: keep deciding and doing in two separate modes, and never let them run at the same time.

Decision mode

  • Be empirical: lean on the decisions (avoidance included) that made you regret before. Your own history is the cheapest data you have.
  • An arbitrary decision is still a hundredfold better than an impulsive one. A choice you can stand behind beats a reaction you were dragged into.
A focused professional reviews blank note cards and a notebook before choosing the next action.
Decision mode gets calmer when the evidence from your own history is on the table before the next move is chosen.

Execution mode

  • You have no other option. Once you have decided, the deciding is over — there is nothing left to weigh.
  • You don’t stop in the middle.
  • Whether it was a great or a bad move is for decision mode to judge — later, in reflection, with a calm head. Not mid-stride.
  • Even when it turns out to be a bad decision, the follow-through strengthens your adherence, your self-worth, and your trust in the heuristic — a long-term yield. You are training the muscle of following through, and that compounds.
A professional works under a desk lamp with a closed notebook beside the laptop, following through after the decision is made.
Execution mode protects the work from being reopened every few minutes; the review can wait until the stride is finished.

This way you save an enormous amount of mental energy from bounced thinking — the exhausting loop of reconsidering a choice while you are supposed to be acting on it.


What did you think?